Comments on: Visual Studio 2008 and DSL Tools http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/ Software Development Life Cycle: Methodologies and Tools for the Enterprise Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:44:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: AlySangadji http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-9269 AlySangadji Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:43:40 +0000 http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-9269 Nice, How about mono Framework? Nice, How about mono Framework?

]]> By: Visual Studio will feature UML support » SDLC Blog http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-7240 Visual Studio will feature UML support » SDLC Blog Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:20:33 +0000 http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-7240 [...] Studio will feature UML support As I wrote in a previous post, one of the main problems I saw in Microsoft Visual Studio DSL Tools was the lack of support for [...] [...] Studio will feature UML support As I wrote in a previous post, one of the main problems I saw in Microsoft Visual Studio DSL Tools was the lack of support for [...]

]]> By: Ferdy http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-3752 Ferdy Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:48:09 +0000 http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-3752 Pascal, we don't have any experience in .NET. We are primarily a J2EE installation, that is one of the reason why we didn't choose VS DSL Tools. Unlike you, we prefer an Eclipse environment. ;-) Pascal, we don’t have any experience in .NET. We are primarily a J2EE installation, that is one of the reason why we didn’t choose VS DSL Tools. Unlike you, we prefer an Eclipse environment. ;-)

]]> By: Pascal http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-3588 Pascal Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:32:34 +0000 http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/11/26/visual-studio-2008-and-dsl-tools/#comment-3588 Hi Ferdy, Interesting article. We've been investigating different MDD solutions the last couple of years. I was quite charmed by the what Acceleo accomplishes, but it does not serve us as much as we like, primarily because it integrates into Eclipse and our own software development facility works with .NET (VS2005). With the advent of VS2008 we, like you, were hoping for more extended MDD support, but unfortunately this does not seem to have Microsoft's real attention. Do you have particular good experience with MDD in the .NET arena apart from the VS DSL tools? Pascal. Hi Ferdy,

Interesting article. We’ve been investigating different MDD solutions the last couple of years. I was quite charmed by the what Acceleo accomplishes, but it does not serve us as much as we like, primarily because it integrates into Eclipse and our own software development facility works with .NET (VS2005). With the advent of VS2008 we, like you, were hoping for more extended MDD support, but unfortunately this does not seem to have Microsoft’s real attention. Do you have particular good experience with MDD in the .NET arena apart from the VS DSL tools?

Pascal.

]]>