<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Zero: a new way to build commercial software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/</link>
	<description>Software Development Life Cycle: Methodologies and Tools for the Enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ferdy</title>
		<link>http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, sounds confusing. But they are not charging fees, they are just licensing it, that it&#039;s a bit different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMHO, the interesting part of this project it&#039;s not only the technological side, but the new development model. It seems like an IBM experiment trying to investigate the, using J. Cuomo words, &quot;social side of the software development process&quot; applied to commercial software, that is, instead of building commercial software in a traditional/closed style, with little customer involvement, they are opening this process to criticism, suggestion, opinions, ... It&#039;s like the open source development process, but applied to commercial software.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, we need to digest it and pay attention to the project zero blog, as I expect more clarifications from IBM in the next days ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, sounds confusing. But they are not charging fees, they are just licensing it, that it&#8217;s a bit different.</p>
<p>IMHO, the interesting part of this project it&#8217;s not only the technological side, but the new development model. It seems like an IBM experiment trying to investigate the, using J. Cuomo words, &#8220;social side of the software development process&#8221; applied to commercial software, that is, instead of building commercial software in a traditional/closed style, with little customer involvement, they are opening this process to criticism, suggestion, opinions, &#8230; It&#8217;s like the open source development process, but applied to commercial software.</p>
<p>Anyway, we need to digest it and pay attention to the project zero blog, as I expect more clarifications from IBM in the next days &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rodenas.org/blog/2007/06/30/project-zero-a-new-way-to-build-commercial-software/#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>It seems quite interesting. However, I wonder why they are charging license fees when there is currently so many Open Source alternatives in the scripting world for rapid web application development and deployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems quite interesting. However, I wonder why they are charging license fees when there is currently so many Open Source alternatives in the scripting world for rapid web application development and deployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
