links for 2007-04-04
-
Nobody at OMG came to defend UML over DSM. The main argument given for using UML is that it is a standard! No problem if it is large and complex, can’t be used for generating efficient code and leads to throwing away models at the end.
2 Comments to “links for 2007-04-04”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks:
Comments:
April 4th, 2007 at 2:32 am
I spent multiple hours talking to people that are very frustated of UML as it does not address any specific domain needs. I also got feedback from an authority in modeling field that some organizations are dumping UML and not taking anything instead… We are going back in software engineering if this is what really is happening. DSM is not trying to replace UML, but to help organizations to be more effective in product-family development and code quality.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:13 am
Petri, thanks for your comment.
Actually I’m analysing MDD methodologies and I’m arriving at the same conclusion about UML (or OMG MDA) and DSM. We (at my company) have some successful DSL implementations, mainly where we have a well-known and stabilized problem domain. But this doesn’t mean we are not using UML anywhere. We only use UML for documenting purposes, not for generating code.
BTW, Jack Greenfield, from Microsoft, has a nice article called Bared-Naked Languages or What Not to Model that summarizes when and when not use UML or DSL.
Leave a reply or a trackback from your own site
Please be respectful in your comments. Do not use fake names or email address, otherwise your comments will be moderated.